0333 5330606
info@marjonlaw.co.uk
Marjon Law, specialist employment lawyers is owner-led by Marc Jones, who is ranked and recommended in legal publications as a leading employment law solicitor, with over 20 years of experience practising solely in employment law.
If you would like urgent advice on redundancy, please contact us as soon as possible.
This web page should be read in conjunction with the web page REDUNDANCY PAY CALCULATOR
The law relating to redundancy is generally found in the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) as amended and the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA).
Redundancy (as defined in section 139 of the ERA) occurs when an employee is dismissed because of:
The definition of business is very broad. It includes any trade or profession, or any activity carried on by a body of persons. The activity may or may not be a commercial activity (eg charities, schools and colleges).
The most common redundancy situation arises where an employer reduces the workforce due to a downturn in business or rationalisation (eg technological advancement).
The test is not whether an employer needs fewer employees but whether an employer needs fewer employees to do work of a particular kind and that this is attributable to the state of affairs of the business.
Difficulties arise when the employer reorganises the way work is done (eg the introduction of a new shift pattern). Although the work remains the same, if an employee is dismissed because of a reorganisation this may not necessarily be due to redundancy and the employer will have to justify the dismissal as being for some other substantial reason.
Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, the dismissal itself (and the procedure leading up to it) must still be fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. This means an employer must show that:
A dismissal for redundancy may be unfair because:
A dismissal for redundancy will be automatically unfair if an employee is selected because:
If an employer cannot show that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was wholly, or mainly, attributable to a redundancy situation it will be unfair.
Statutory consultation is required:
When calculating the number of employees at the time of compulsory redundancies this will include those employees that have been offered and accepted voluntary redundancy (Optare Group Ltd v TGWU).
There is no minimum statutory consultation period when making less than 20 employees redundant. However, employees have a right to be genuinely consulted about redundancy proposals.
Consultation should begin as soon as reasonably practicable and before the final decision to dismiss those identified for redundancy. At all stages of the consultation process, it should be fair and genuine, and employees should have the opportunity to express their views and put forward proposals for avoiding redundancies and/or dismissal.
Once it becomes clear that redundancies may be necessary, the consultation process begins and requires an employer to consider ways of avoiding dismissals, to identify the number of employees to be dismissed, and to reduce the consequences of dismissals, including:
When facing the possibility of redundancies, your employer should analyse which employees are performing work of a particular kind that has either ceased or diminished. This is known as the selection pool.
Your employer needs to be able to show that the system for choosing the pool is fair. If it cannot, then any redundancy could lead to an employment tribunal claim for unfair dismissal.
If there is a customary arrangement or procedure for choosing a selection pool, then this should be used unless the employer can show objective grounds for not using it.
If there is no customary arrangement or procedure, then your employer simply needs to show that they have considered the pool carefully and acted with genuine motives.
The pool should contain all employees who perform the same or similar type of work in a particular department or at a relevant location.
Certain groups of employees can be included in the pool even though the redundancy exercise does not on the face of it affect them as the targeted roles occur elsewhere within the company (eg if the roles in the pool are interchangeable).
If only 1 employee is identified within the pool, performing a particular role, they will be in a unique position and there is no requirement to go through a selection procedure. However, if the selection pool is flawed and the employee is dismissed by reason of redundancy, they may have a claim for unfair dismissal.
The selection criteria, which will normally form part of a selection matrix, must be systematic, consistent, justifiable and objective (as possible), and applied fairly. A points-scoring method is commonly used. The selection matrix will normally include such factors as:
The lengths to which an employment tribunal expects an employer to go in drawing up and applying criteria will depend on the employer’s size and administrative resources. Therefore, less is expected of a smaller employer. However, even small employers must show that they used a fair selection method.
For information about redundancy pay and how is it calculated, please see web page redundancy pay calculator.
The material contained in this web page is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. Appropriate legal advice should be sought for specific circumstances and before action is taken.
We have been involved directly and indirectly with hundreds of employment tribunal claims for clients for over 20 years, many of which involved redundancy.
As specialist employment lawyers, our clients' interests are paramount to us.
We ensure that all our clients receive the best advice possible.
We will advise on the process after the redundancy, any settlement agreement that may be offered, and any subsequent employment tribunal claim.
Contact us today ...
Thank you for contacting us.
We will get back to you as soon as possible.
Kind regards
Marjon Law
Legal
Marjon Law is a trading name of Marjon Law Ltd, a company incorporated and registered in England & Wales,
Registered office is 27 Old Gloucester Street • London • WC1N 3AX
Authorised and regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and a registered BSB entity
Copyright © 2025 Marjon Law Ltd
All rights reserved