0333 5330606
info@marjonlaw.co.uk
Marjon Law, specialist employment lawyers is owner-led by Marc Jones, who is ranked and recommended in legal publications as a leading employment law solicitor, with over 20 years of experience practising solely in employment law.
If you would like urgent advice on negotiating an exit package, please contact us as soon as possible.
This applies to both employers and employees.
From an employer's point of view, an exit package incorporated in a settlement agreement might be preferable:
An employee might want to negotiate an exit package:
Marjon Law can advise both employees and employers on the best exit packages and negotiate on their behalf. We can also prepare and advise on the terms of a settlement agreement, which is a legally binding document between employer and employee that an employee must take independent legal advice on before signing the agreement.
However, there may be situations where the employee and/or the employer want to negotiate the exit package themselves. In this situation, the employee or the employer should:
If an employer or an employee has not negotiated an exit package before or believes that the process could be difficult or unpredictable, then legal advice should be sought at the earliest opportunity (preferably from Marjon Law who have over 20 years of experience negotiating settlements).
Employees and employers should discuss negotiating a settlement with their business partner or domestic partner, as two heads can be better than one if this is a new experience.
Both an employer and an employee can instigate a protected conversation, which is a confidential discussion between employer and employee that cannot be referred to in an employment tribunal claim for unfair dismissal.
Whether a protected conversation is necessary will depend on the background to instigating an exit conversation. The more contentious, the less likely such a conversation will be appropriate.
The relevant documents will be:
Without the relevant documents, the employer or the employee could be negotiating from an incorrect starting position and agree to terms that may be detrimental to them.
This is often the crux of most negotiations, which can lead to a stand-off between what the employer is prepared to pay versus what the employee is prepared to accept by way of a termination payment. Therefore, both the employer and the employee should be prepared to compromise if they want the employee's exit to take place under a settlement agreement.
The relevant documents should provide evidence of what the employee is entitled to receive on termination. That said, there is nothing preventing the employer from offering or the employee from requesting non-contractual benefits (eg the employee's work laptop and/or mobile phone).
This will depend on the background to negotiating the exit package:
Often this is relevant where the employee is in a senior position or manages a team, as without a leaving statement a sudden departure could look suspicious or raise uncomfortable questions. If a leaving statement is required, then the employer and the employee will need to agree on the wording.
In this day and age, many employers have a policy of only providing factual references. If that is the case, then an employee may find it hard to obtain a full reference from their employer. If the employer does not have such a policy, then the employee should prepare a draft reference of what the employer has to say about them.
Unless the employer or the employee has been party to a settlement agreement before, the process will be new, and the terms may on paper look good but after taking legal advice may need to be amended. Therefore, the less confident the employee is about the terms of a settlement agreement the higher the legal costs should be to ensure they take the correct advice from a specialist employment law solicitor (from Marjon Law) and are not left out of pocket.
This is a key element in negotiations: knowing how hard to push and when to stop!
Continuing to push a negotiation when one of the parties has made it clear that they have made a final offer, may lead to a withdrawal of the offer of an exit package and a potential deterioration of the relationship between employer and employee (if it was not previously broken). For example, if an employee starts ACAS early conciliation when negotiations are not progressing might be viewed by the employer as an attempt to increase the leverage in the negotiations and a hostile act.
There are no one-size fits in negotiating an exit package. The parties will have to weigh the benefits and disadvantages of each course of action. There is no substitute for experienced employment law specialists (Marjon Law) when negotiating an exit package.
The material contained in this web page is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. Appropriate legal advice should be sought for specific circumstances and before action is taken.
We have been involved in negotiations for clients for over 20 years.
As specialist employment lawyers, our clients' interests are paramount to us.
We ensure that all our clients receive the best advice possible.
We will advise on the best exit package and negotiate terms of settlement on our clients' behalf.
Contact us today ...
Thank you for contacting us.
We will get back to you as soon as possible.
Kind regards
Marjon Law
Legal
Marjon Law is a trading name of Marjon Law Ltd, a company incorporated and registered in England & Wales,
Registered office is 27 Old Gloucester Street • London • WC1N 3AX
Authorised and regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and a registered BSB entity
Copyright © 2025 Marjon Law Ltd
All rights reserved